Relationship of Udder Morphometric Traits with Milk Production in Dairy Cattle and Buffaloes
Udder Traits and Milk Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/mjz.v6i2.163Keywords:
Udder Morphometry, Teat Traits, Milk Production, Somatic Cell CountAbstract
Pakistan’s dairy industry depends on cattle and buffaloes for milk production. Subclinical Mastitis (SCM), on the other hand, is a serious restriction that lowers milk quality and quantity. Objective: To examine the udder and teat morphometric characteristics of cattle and buffaloes and evaluate how they relate to Somatic Cell Count (SCC), milk output, composition, and mineral content. Methods: A total of 150 lactating animals (75 cattle and 75 buffaloes) were sampled from five farms in Faisalabad. Milk yield was recorded over three consecutive mornings using a digital meter, while composition and SNF were analyzed. with a Lactoscan SLP SCC was quantified, and minerals were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Udder and teat dimensions were taken using a Vernier caliper, tape, and visual observation. Results: The findings showed that, funnel/cylindrical teats and pendulous udders had significantly higher width and depth (p < 0.05), as well as significantly larger teat diameter and length (p<0.05). Pendulous and spherical udders (p <0.01) and funnel, pear, and cylindrical teats (p <0.05) were substantially linked to higher SCC. While several teat measurements, such right front teat length and left front teat diameter, exhibited moderately negative relationships (r = –0.31, p = 0.02, r = –0.26, p = 0.04), there was a positive link between milk yield andudder width (r = 0.45, p = 0.003). Additionally, morphology had a significant impact on the mineral content and composition of milk (p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggested that, selecting dairy animals with favorable udder and teat characteristics could improve udder health and milk productivity.
References
Murtaza G and Kausar R. Dried, dehydrated, and fermented milk. InHandbook of Milk Production, Quality and Nutrition 2025 Jan: 541-551. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-24820-7.00061-4.
Boland M. 'Designer'milks: functional foods from milk. InImproving the safety and quality of milk 2010 Jan: 74-93. doi: 10.1533/9781845699437.1.74.
Khalid MH, Deeba F, Qureshi AS, Noor A, Umer S, Shah MK et al. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science.
Paul T. Clinical and Ultrasonographical Evaluation of Mammary Gland during Mastitis in Ruminants (Doctoral dissertation, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Chittagong-4225, Bangladesh). 2022 Jun.
Tommasoni C, Fiore E, Lisuzzo A, Gianesella M. Mastitis in dairy cattle: on-farm diagnostics and future perspectives. Animals. 2023 Aug; 13(15): 2538. doi: 10.3390/ani13152538.
Kashoma IP. Udder and teat morphometry and its relationship with occurrence of intramammary infections in dairy cattle. East African Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation. 2023 Mar; 4(2). doi: 10.37425/eajsti.v4i2.602.
Bansal BK. Udder and teat morphometry in relation to udder health and milk quality in dairy cows. Training Manual. 2024: 20.
Sharma A, Sharma S, Singh N, Sharma V, Pal RS. Impact of udder and teat morphometry on udder health in Tharparkar cows under climatic condition of hot arid region of Thar Desert. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2016 Dec; 48(8): 1647-52. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1138-y.
Vrdoljak J, Prpić Z, Samaržija D, Vnučec I, Konjačić M, Kelava Ugarković N. Udder morphology, milk production and udder health in small ruminants. Mljekarstvo: časopis za unaprjeđenje proizvodnje i prerade mlijeka. 2020 Mar; 70(2): 75-84. doi: 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2020.0201.
Du B, Meng L, Liu H, Zheng N, Zhang Y, Guo X et al. Impacts of milking and housing environment on milk microbiota. Animals. 2020 Dec; 10(12): 2339. doi: 10.3390/ani10122339.
Bhutto AL, Murray RD, Woldehiwet Z. California mastitis test scores as indicators of subclinical intra-mammary infections at the end of lactation in dairy cows. Research in Veterinary Science. 2012 Feb; 92(1): 13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.10.006.
Sinha R, Sinha B, Kumari R, Vineeth MR, Shrivastava K, Verma A et al. Udder and teat morphometry in relation to clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2022 Apr; 54(2): 99. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03077-y.
Forsbäck L, Lindmark-Månsson H, Andrén A, Åkerstedt M, Andrée L, Svennersten-Sjaunja K. Day-to-day variation in milk yield and milk composition at the udder-quarter level. Journal of dairy science. 2010 Aug; 93(8): 3569-77. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-3015.
Zecconi A, Dell'Orco F, Vairani D, Rizzi N, Cipolla M, Zanini L. Differential somatic cell count as a marker for changes of milk composition in cows with very low somatic cell count. Animals. 2020 Apr; 10(4): 604. doi: 10.3390/ani10040604.
Cathcart EB, Shelford JA, Peterson RG. Mineral analyses of dairy cattle feed in the upper Fraser Valley of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1980 Mar; 60(1): 177-83. doi: 10.4141/cjas80-023.
Poudel SP, Chetri DK, Sah R, Jamarkatel M. Research article Relationship between Udder and Teat Conformations and Morphometrics with Milk Yield in Murrah Buffaloes. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University. 2022 Apr; 5: 209. doi: 10.3126/jafu.v5i1.48467.
Saleh AA, Easa AA, El-Hedainy DK, Rashad AM. Prediction of some milk production traits using udder and teat measurements with a spotlight on their genetic background in Friesian cows. Scientific Reports. 2023 Sep; 13(1): 16193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43398-y.
Kaur G, Bansal BK, Singh RS, Kashyap N, Sharma S. Associations of teat morphometric parameters and subclinical mastitis in riverine buffaloes. Journal of Dairy Research. 2018 Aug; 85(3): 303-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022029918000444.
Batavani RA, Asri S, Naebzadeh H. The effect of subclinical mastitis on milk composition in dairy cows. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research 2007 Jan; 8(20).
Costa A, Neglia G, Campanile G, De Marchi M. Milk somatic cell count and its relationship with milk yield and quality traits in Italian water buffaloes. Journal of Dairy Science. 2020 Jun; 103(6): 5485-94. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 MARKHOR (The Journal of Zoology)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments editor@markhorjournal.com